LPPFusion
LPPFusion
Empowering The World
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Company Milestones
    • Team
    • Board of Advisors
    • Fusion FAQ
    • X-Scan Technology
    • Contact
  • How Can I Help?
    • Invest in Equity Crowdfunding Campaign
    • Donate to Help the Research
    • Promotional Materials
      • Crowdfunding Information
  • News
  • Investing
    • Executive Summary
    • Business Road Map
    • Prospects for Success
    • Cost Advantage and ROI
    • Investing In LPPF
  • Fusion
    • Focus Fusion
      • Focus Fusion Safety
      • Focus Fusion Timelines
    • DPF Device
    • Aneutronic Fusion
      • Aneutronic Fusion Approaches
    • Peer Reviews
    • Brief History of Fusion Power
    • Competing Technologies
  • Science
    • Cosmic Connection
    • Physics Foundations
    • Space Propulsion
  • Impact
    • Peace
    • Environment
  • Media
    • Albums
    • Events
  • Papers
  • Patents
  • Reports
MENU CLOSE back  

Calculations Explain Destruction of Filaments

You are here:
  1. Home
  2. Aneutronic, LPPF News
  3. Calculations Explain Destruction of Filaments
LPP Fusion LOGO December 8, 2016


It’s clear that the existence or non-existence of filaments—dense vortices of current and plasma—in the current sheet has a huge impact on the functioning of FF-1, because the filaments are the first stage of compressing the plasma. The disruption of the filaments is a key reason for lower-than-expected fusion yields in past experiments. Yet, while many researchers have studied filamentation, it has been difficult to get a clear understanding of when they form and how they are destroyed. New calculations by Lerner have used the concept of minimum dissipation of energy to figure out this problem. In general, processes will minimize the amount of energy they dissipate or turn into heat—Mother Nature is not lazy, but she is efficient. If hydrodynamic friction dominates this energy dissipation, the Rayleigh-Taylor instability will conserve or produce filaments because filaments dissipate less energy moving through the background gas than does a solid sheet. But if electrical resistance dissipates more energy, then the electric current tends to spread out to minimize this resistance. This spreading can disrupt filaments, or prevent their generation.

 

Impurities, such as tungsten, can greatly increase electrical resistance, because when such heavy ions lose several electrons, their greater charge makes collisions with electrons in the current much more likely. The new calculations show that filaments with large radii tend to be more stable than those with small ones. But with tungsten impurities of even 4% by mass, filaments would have to be so large they would merge with their neighbors, and so be disrupted. Since in the last experiment, we had about 20% tungsten impurities by mass, that indicates that we can avoid disruption of the filament only if we can reduce the impurities by ten-fold or so. This gives us a good quantitative goal to aim for in the elimination of oxygen. To achieve this level of impurity, initial oxygen in the chamber has to be less than about 10 micrograms, an achievable level.

 

Lerner also made more detailed calculation of the damage that can be expected from the recombination radiation for both filaments and a non-filamented current sheet. Further research showed that the most damaging form of radiation is “dielectronic recombination radiation,” which occurs when a free electron recombines with an ion, and the energy is absorbed by a second, bound electron, which jumps to a higher energy level. The second electron then radiates the energy when it jumps back down to lower energy. The calculation showed that with even small tungsten impurities, some 30 MW/cm2 of radiation will hit the end of the anode, enough to melt tungsten and cause heavy erosion. So Lerner does not expect this source of erosion to improve greatly in the next experiment. However, these impurities will enter the plasma too late to affect the fusion yield. In addition, once the experiments switch to beryllium as the electrode material, recombination radiation will be practically eliminated. The beryllium ions, with only 4 electrons, will be completely stripped. In this case, the calculation indicates a 40-fold decrease in radiation, falling below that needed to melt beryllium.

 

This news piece is part of the December, 2016 report. To download the report click here.

Related posts

LPPFusion Vacuum Chamber 3D Render
Upgraded Vacuum Chamber Designed and Ordered
April 12, 2018
EU Patent Office Logo
LPPFusion Granted European Union Patent
April 12, 2018
Initial Simulation of Heating of the Electrodes in FF-1
Thermal Study of Electrodes Begins
March 29, 2018
American Fusion Project & Fusion Consortium
New Fusion Industry Alliance Formed, LPPFusion Joins
March 29, 2018
LPP Fusion LOGO
Preparations for Beryllium, Boron Experiments
February 2, 2018
ICCD January 2018 Shots
Tungsten Experiments Conclude with New Insights, Upgrades in Instruments and Equipment
February 2, 2018
Menu
  • ImpactImpact
  • Focus FusionFocus Fusion
  • EnvironmentEnvironment
  • DPF DeviceDPF Device
  • Aneutronic FusionAneutronic
  • Cosmic ConnectionCosmic Connection
  • PeacePeace
  • Physics FoundationsPhysics Foundations
  • Join An Event
  • Crowdfund
  • Get Involved
  • Discuss
  • Volunteer
  • Shop Fusion
  • Donate
News Archives Search
Photos
Syed in FF-1 Shot 052317 – 02 Preionization with Nitrogen Mix Upper Vacuum Chamber Tungsten Electrodes Microwave Combiner Tungsten Deposits on the Inside of Vacuum Chamber Rogowski Coil Encased in Protective Glass Sleeve Electrodes2
Contact Info
Lawrenceville Plasma Physics, Inc. DBA LPPFusion
  • Address
    128 Lincoln Blvd. Middlesex, NJ 08846-1022
  • Telephone
    (732) 356-5900
  • Fax
    (732) 377-0381

Find us on:

FacebookTwitterGoogle+YouTubeVimeo
Copyright © 2018 LPPFusion